Anne Wilson wrote: > It seems that now you have to mark a key as 'Ultimately Trusted' before you > can encrypt with it. > > This feels totally wrong to me, but there's nothing I can do about it. i agree. but i guess that is one of pleasures of authoring a program, you have the right to change what you want when you want, even if it is just to keep users on their toes. :) glad you got it worked out. now you can sleep even better tonight. -- peace out. tc,hago. g . **** in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today. ** to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it. to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it. ** learn linux: 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ **** -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20090727/53f25d5b/attachment.bin
