kde-4.2.90 and nepomuk, good, bad,ugly?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: kde-4.2.90 and nepomuk, good, bad,ugly?
From: rdieter at math.unl.edu (Rex Dieter)
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:18:12 -0500
In-reply-to: <200906221358.11526.cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4A3A9696.1040601@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <200906221304.04258.cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200906221325.17207.clive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200906221358.11526.cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Anne Wilson wrote:

> Is this related to the akonadi problem I'm having, specifically the fact that 
> akonadi keeps trying and failing to start?

I doubt it, nepomuk and akonadi are (largely) unrelated.

-- Rex

References:
- kde-4.2.90 and nepomuk, good, bad,ugly?
  - From: Rex Dieter
- kde-4.2.90 and nepomuk, good, bad,ugly?
  - From: Anne Wilson
- kde-4.2.90 and nepomuk, good, bad,ugly?
  - From: Clive Messer
- kde-4.2.90 and nepomuk, good, bad,ugly?
  - From: Anne Wilson

Prev by Date: kde-4.2.90 and nepomuk, good, bad,ugly?
Next by Date: kde-4.2.90 and nepomuk, good, bad,ugly?
Previous by thread: kde-4.2.90 and nepomuk, good, bad,ugly?
Next by thread: kde-4.2.90 and nepomuk, good, bad,ugly?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KDE Users] [Fedora General Discussion] [Older Fedora Users Mail] [Fedora Advisory Board] [Fedora Security] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Mentors] [Fedora Package Announce] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora Music] [Fedora Packaging] [Centos] [Fedora SELinux] [Fedora Triage] [Coolkey] [Yum Users] [Yosemite Forum] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux