kde-4.2.90 and nepomuk, good, bad,ugly?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: kde-4.2.90 and nepomuk, good, bad,ugly?
From: rdieter at math.unl.edu (Rex Dieter)
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:33:42 -0500

Just threw virtuoso-opensource into kde-redhat/unstable repos.

If you've got kde-4.2.90 installed, and don't mind testing out nepomuk, 
install virtuoso-opensource , and report back.

good?  bad?  ugly?

-- Rex

Follow-Ups:
- kde-4.2.90 and nepomuk, good, bad,ugly?
  - From: Arthur Pemberton

Prev by Date: KDE-SIG weekly report (25/2009)
Next by Date: kde-4.2.90 and nepomuk, good, bad,ugly?
Previous by thread: Sharing brand with upstream [Was: [Design-team] Building Brand Together]
Next by thread: kde-4.2.90 and nepomuk, good, bad,ugly?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KDE Users] [Fedora General Discussion] [Older Fedora Users Mail] [Fedora Advisory Board] [Fedora Security] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Mentors] [Fedora Package Announce] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora Music] [Fedora Packaging] [Centos] [Fedora SELinux] [Fedora Triage] [Coolkey] [Yum Users] [Yosemite Forum] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux