kde-4.2.90 and nepomuk, good, bad,ugly?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Rex Dieter<rdieter at math.unl.edu> wrote:
> Just threw virtuoso-opensource into kde-redhat/unstable repos.
>
> If you've got kde-4.2.90 installed, and don't mind testing out nepomuk,
> install virtuoso-opensource , and report back.
>
> good? ?bad? ?ugly?
>


Is there a description of what Nepomuk is? If I find the time to do
this test, I'd like to know what to look for.


-- 
Fedora 10
(www.pembo13.com)



[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux