What happened to kpackage?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 03 April 2009 22:14:17 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Anne Wilson wrote:
> > It was necessary to run updatedb.  It seems that Smart needed to build
> > its own database before KPackage could run.  It is now loaded, listing
> > the packages, but every package appears to have a red X over it.  Any
> > idea what that means?
>
> Well, I tried KPackage for a few minutes lately. I found it to be extremely
> buggy to the point of being entirely unusable. I strongly recommend not
> using it. KPackageKit is the way to go. I think KPackage is likely to go
> away upstream soon, or at least move to extragear or even playground. It
> doesn't look actively maintained and it's just horribly buggy.
>
It's a pity, really, as it does offer quick access to a lot of information 
about packages.  However.....  Now I'm left having to decide whether to leave 
an embarrassingly bad screenshot on userbase or to remove the application 
altogether from userbase.

Anne
-- 
New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
Just found a cool new feature?  Add it to UserBase
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20090404/a6999c49/attachment.bin 


[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux