On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 11:17 -0400, Patrick Boutilier wrote: > Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 07:33 +0000, Jos? Matos wrote: > >> On Thursday 05 March 2009 01:58:40 Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > >>> I don't question any of that, in fact it's clear to me that I won't be > >>> testing the thing myself, but I think my original point is being missed, > >>> to wit: would it not have been useful to include a brief summary of what > >>> the package is about so those of use who are not interested can know > >>> we're not interested? > >> Some (if not all) of those issues have been discussed on this list since the > >> beginning of kde-4.2.0 testing although the resulting explanation was not as > >> detailed as it happened on this thread. > > > > The very first reference I can find to either soprano or sesame on this > > list is Rex's message. Perhaps you can point out some earlier discussion > > here? > > > I believe he meant in general. Not specifically about this package. That's not at all clear. He talks about "those issues" and "the resulting explanation ... on this thread" without defining which issues and what explanation. Never mind. poc
