Anne Wilson wrote: > On Thursday 26 February 2009 21:02:47 Arthur Pemberton wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Anne Wilson <cannewilson at googlemail.com> > wrote: >>> On my F10 + 4.2 install I have a very recently created public keyring. I >>> manually imported half a dozen signatures. Kgpg lists them, and KMail >>> uses them. Everything seemed fine. >>> >>> KMail is set to import signatures automatically. I've seen it import >>> quite a few since then, and the messages report the status of the >>> signature. However, those signatures are not seen by Kgpg - and never >>> show up in the key management screen. >>> >>> I've discussed this on the kde-pim list. >>> I've talked to a kgpg developer. >>> I've talked to a kmail developer. >>> I've asked on IRC #kontact. >>> >>> No-one seems to have any idea, other than the stock 'it must be fedora' >>> :-) >>> >>> Anne >> As part of a class I tried to setup a gnupg and send an encrypted >> email. KGPG was helpful (even though I used the console) but couldn't >> get Kmail to properly encrypt with the receivers public key. Evolution >> wasn't as picky. This was on Centos 5.2 however. >> > KMail is signing and encrypting without any problem. > >> But basically, if I had to randomly guess, I'd assume that Kmail was >> the problem. > > You can't. Neither the KMail devs nor the Kgpg ones know what's happening. > A kubuntu user is running kde 4.2 and kgpg is working correctly for him, but > that's the only thing I've managed to tie down. rpm -q gnupg2 gnupg Fedora's gpgme defaults to using gnupg2(/usr/bin/gpg2), maybe some parts of kmail/kgpg still depend on gnupg(1) somehow? -- Rex
