On Wednesday 04 February 2009 10:40:20 Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > On Tuesday 03 February 2009 20:37:25 Eli Wapniarski wrote: > > On Tuesday 03 February 2009 19:22:38 Eli Wapniarski wrote: > > > On Tuesday 03 February 2009 16:49:48 Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 03 February 2009 15:32:03 Rex Dieter wrote: > > > > > Eli Wapniarski wrote: > > > > > > The guidelines seem to indicate first things need to get passed > > > > > > and after they pass I can ask for sponsorship. > > > > > > > > > > Though, the usual procedure is that your first reviewer is usually > > > > > your sponsor. Doing these in parallel is ok too. > > > > > > > > > > I'd be happy for Jaroslav (or other) do a first review here, and > > > > > once most review issues are sorted out, I (or another sponsor) give > > > > > things a final review before approving the pkg(s) and sponsoring > > > > > you. > > > > > > > > Ok, I'm reviewing it right now, it's better to do it asap because > > > > later we can forgot about this packages. Still waiting for Lukas'es > > > > kio_sysinfo review ;-) I'll ping you when we sort out issues and we > > > > have package in good shape. The first one - I hate Cashew is really > > > > easy to review but the second one brings again flags issue :( > > > > > > > > Jaroslav > > > > > > > > > Have you created a FAS account yet? If not, please do so... we > > > > > could even forgo the wait on reviews. > > > > > > I've got a Fedora account. The instructions on how to ask to be > > > sponsored are not at all clear. It provides no navigation at all other > > > than where there are a list of sponsores. > > > > Just wondering if I got this right... I added "FE-NEEDSPONSOR" to the > > blocks field. Is that right? > > Don't hurry :-) > Review is on beginning! There are several other rules to be checked and > then we have to wait for Rex or Kevin, I can't sponsor you. In this case > you don't need to set FE-NEEDSPONSOR because we can sponsor you. > > Ok, I'm going to finish review, you're lucky - some packages can wait years > for it :D > Thanks Jaroslav Eli -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kde/attachments/20090204/f60c7f7f/attachment.html