On Tuesday 03 February 2009 20:37:25 Eli Wapniarski wrote: > On Tuesday 03 February 2009 19:22:38 Eli Wapniarski wrote: > > On Tuesday 03 February 2009 16:49:48 Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > > On Tuesday 03 February 2009 15:32:03 Rex Dieter wrote: > > > > Eli Wapniarski wrote: > > > > > The guidelines seem to indicate first things need to get passed and > > > > > after they pass I can ask for sponsorship. > > > > > > > > Though, the usual procedure is that your first reviewer is usually > > > > your sponsor. Doing these in parallel is ok too. > > > > > > > > I'd be happy for Jaroslav (or other) do a first review here, and once > > > > most review issues are sorted out, I (or another sponsor) give things > > > > a final review before approving the pkg(s) and sponsoring you. > > > > > > Ok, I'm reviewing it right now, it's better to do it asap because later > > > we can forgot about this packages. Still waiting for Lukas'es > > > kio_sysinfo review ;-) I'll ping you when we sort out issues and we > > > have package in good shape. The first one - I hate Cashew is really > > > easy to review but the second one brings again flags issue :( > > > > > > Jaroslav > > > > > > > Have you created a FAS account yet? If not, please do so... we could > > > > even forgo the wait on reviews. > > > > I've got a Fedora account. The instructions on how to ask to be sponsored > > are not at all clear. It provides no navigation at all other than where > > there are a list of sponsores. > > Just wondering if I got this right... I added "FE-NEEDSPONSOR" to the > blocks field. Is that right? Don't hurry :-) Review is on beginning! There are several other rules to be checked and then we have to wait for Rex or Kevin, I can't sponsor you. In this case you don't need to set FE-NEEDSPONSOR because we can sponsor you. Ok, I'm going to finish review, you're lucky - some packages can wait years for it :D Jaroslav > > Eli
