what is stable?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> wrote:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>>> Proposition for the KDE sig.
>>>
>>> Only do one or two full KDE releases to updates per Fedora release.
>>> But keep a rapid pace in updates testing as before. Those of us who
>>> want the fluidity will simply move to updates-testing
>>
>> Huh???
>
> I'll go out on a limb, and guess that part of what stability means for
> Arthur is to have stuff change less.  (Am I close?).

Well it seems that for many people, that's what stability can be
directly related to. I'm personally just happy for the updates.

> But, for the sake of argument, let's leave updates frequency/policy out
> out of the discussion for now.  I'm still more interested in identifying
> what is releasable (in a distro)... then we can move on these other
> related ideas.

Fair enough.

-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )



[Index of Archives]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Triage]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux