On Wednesday 28 of January 2009 17:12:54 Sven Lankes wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 08:46:33AM -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote: > >> http://bugs.kde.org > > > > I'm frustrated entering bugs into bugzillas. Its a 15 minute process > > logging in, searching to see if its already entered, filling everything > > in, etc. Bugzilla needs a template that users can prefill for various > > bugs to speed things up. > > Yes - reporting bugs can be frustrating and bugzilla is not (always) a very > userfriendly piece of software. Especially KDE bugzilla is not userfriendly :( > > > And half the time it doesn't get looked at for weeks and by that time > > the page isn't up anymore. > > That is how free software works. The best (browser)-bugreports are those > where the bugs are already isolated with the test-case attached to the > bug and not buried in 200k of html. > > Well defined bugs will increase the probablility of a quick fix > tremendously. > > > I got upset with Konqueror a couple years ago and did a blitz of > > entering bug reports for web pages that didn't work. The results were > > pretty dismal. I gave up. > > Maybe spending some time on bug-triage of konqueror-bugs would be a good > way to help out for you then? > > Yes - sometimes bugs rot in $bugtracker until they're no longer relevant > but that is the price you pay for free software. -- Jaroslav ?ezn?k <jreznik at redhat.com> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 731 455 332 Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/
