On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 08:46:33AM -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote: >> http://bugs.kde.org > I'm frustrated entering bugs into bugzillas. Its a 15 minute process > logging in, searching to see if its already entered, filling everything > in, etc. Bugzilla needs a template that users can prefill for various > bugs to speed things up. Yes - reporting bugs can be frustrating and bugzilla is not (always) a very userfriendly piece of software. > And half the time it doesn't get looked at for weeks and by that time > the page isn't up anymore. That is how free software works. The best (browser)-bugreports are those where the bugs are already isolated with the test-case attached to the bug and not buried in 200k of html. Well defined bugs will increase the probablility of a quick fix tremendously. > I got upset with Konqueror a couple years ago and did a blitz of > entering bug reports for web pages that didn't work. The results were > pretty dismal. I gave up. Maybe spending some time on bug-triage of konqueror-bugs would be a good way to help out for you then? Yes - sometimes bugs rot in $bugtracker until they're no longer relevant but that is the price you pay for free software. -- sven === jabber/xmpp: sven at lankes.net