Could/should the new nvidia driver be added to the release candidate live release ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Could/should the new nvidia driver be added to the release candidate live release ?
From: kevin.kofler at chello.at (Kevin Kofler)
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 03:03:22 +0100
In-reply-to: <gkon1g$ug3$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <1232048068.15910.28.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1232065345.23361.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <gkon1g$ug3$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Friday 16 January 2009, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> The blob is not a part of Fedora. Please report to rpmfusion or to nVidia
> directly.

Note that most likely RPM Fusion will just tell you "please file this upstream 
at nVidia", as they, too, are unable to fix anything in the binary blob.

        Kevin Kofler

References:
- Could/should the new nvidia driver be added to the release candidate live release ?
  - From: Linuxguy123
- Could/should the new nvidia driver be added to the release candidate live release ?
  - From: Linuxguy123
- Could/should the new nvidia driver be added to the release candidate live release ?
  - From: Ben Boeckel

Prev by Date: Could/should the new nvidia driver be added to the release candidate live release ?
Next by Date: Problems running Fedora 10 KDE in VMWare Workstation 6.5
Previous by thread: Could/should the new nvidia driver be added to the release candidate live release ?
Next by thread: Could/should the new nvidia driver be added to the release candidate live release ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KDE Users] [Fedora General Discussion] [Older Fedora Users Mail] [Fedora Advisory Board] [Fedora Security] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Mentors] [Fedora Package Announce] [Fedora Package Review] [Fedora Music] [Fedora Packaging] [Centos] [Fedora SELinux] [Fedora Triage] [Coolkey] [Yum Users] [Yosemite Forum] [Fedora Art] [Fedora Docs] [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux