On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 12:47 PM Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On pondělí 4. září 2023 15:35:41 CEST Michal Konecny wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I finished investigation for migration from registry.fp.o to quay.io. It > > is available in ARC investigation document [0]. The investigation ticket > > [1] is on fedora-infra tracker. > > JFYI, Mock switched to "--use-bootstrap-image" (podman pulling images > from various registries by default) and we had no single issue reported > against the Fedora's registry, but CentOS (on quay.io) gives us random > "pull" failures: > > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/issues/1191 > > So the stability might not be as ideal as with the current registry. > > Pavel > > > Looking forward for any feedback. > > I'm not super-enthused about this from a few perspectives: 1. Core artifacts should be able to be produced, hosted, and consumed from Fedora infrastructure. 2. Quay ultimately does not need to care about Fedora as a stakeholder 3. Quay.io is moving into console.redhat.com[a], which makes it even less fun since RH accounts for the console require giving a lot more information. [a]: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/PROJQUAY-5434 -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
