On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:20 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 3:01 PM Stephen Smoogen <ssmoogen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 17:56, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Here's my thoughts on rhel9 upgrades. > >> > >> We have 188 RHEL7 or RHEL8 instances (counting both vm's and bare hardware). > >> > >> > >> Some will just not move anytime soon: > >> > > > > Is it possible to look at these as 'why does this need fedmsg?' 'what happens if it doesn't have fedmsg', and 'do we need it?' > > > > mailman01 is one where maybe not having it on fedmsg wouldn't be earth shattering but it also has the bigger problem of all its libraries being FTBFS in Fedora and being retired from there. At which point we go with 'do we need to run mailing lists?' > > > > The mailman stack is FTBFS on Fedora right now because of a single > library (python-aiosmtpd) not working properly because of changes in > the SSL module in Python 3.10. The whole stack can branch into RHEL 9 > just fine. > And apparently that issue was fixed. Branching Mailman in EPEL9 is waiting on people adding infra-sig and epel-packagers-sig to dependencies of the stack. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030061 -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
