On Sat, Jul 02, 2022 at 05:36:52PM -0500, Maxwell G wrote: > On Saturday, July 2, 2022 2:51:02 PM CDT Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > * Are you a packager already (ie, in the packager group) and would like > > to help us out by maintaining infra-sig packages? Let me know if so! > > I have been handling the ansible collections (besides ansible-collection- > google-cloud) for a little while now. I'm happy to continue doing that. If you > want to add me to the infra-sig, I can try to help out with bugs and updates > when I have the time. That would be awesome! > Also, I remember that there was an issue with the fedora-messaging ansible > callback plugin not working due to fedora-messaging not being packaged for > python38 on EPEL 8. Is that still an issue? I could maybe (not promising :)) > help with that. Well, yes and no. Currently the callback plugin doesn't work, but that just means no fedora-messages for ansible playbook runs in infrastructure. I am not sure anyone but me cared about them. In order to make it work, I think we would need to make a complete pile of fedora-messaging packages against python3.8. However, I'm thinking we should just move batcave01 to rhel9 soon and that will make this not matter (at least for a while, until ansible-core needs python3.12 or something). > > > * Finally, I'd like to drop some packages that the sig currently > > maintains. There's 68 packages that the infra-sig is admin on currently. > > There's 222 packages infra-sig has commit on. > > I'm assuming the packages where Fedora Infra is the upstream (e.g. bodhi*) > will be kept? Yes. Many of those were also setup with packit to keep them updated, which is nice. > I opened up a couple random packages and noticed that mote, which is in the > second list, was retired by @churchyard 2 years due to it FTI, but it still > exists in epel7. I would suggest either going through the unretirement process > or just completely retiring and then orphaning that package. We just deployed a completely new version of mote. We don't deploy it via rpms, and I don't know if there's any plans to package it, but if there is, it could be re-added and use the mote rpm package name. > pam_url was > orphaned two weeks ago, but @infra-sig still has admin on that package. > @infra-sig can probably be removed from that package. Yeah. Done. > Maybe it would also be worthwhile to triage/reassign bugs with the packages > the @infra-sig maintains in the weekly infra meeting so all of the work > doesn't fall on you? (I occasionally skim the meeting meeting minutes, but > maybe I'll join one day if the scheduling works out!). We could... we already spend a lot of time on tickets tho. I suppose we could take our current schedule of doing one learning topic and one ticket triage to 3: learning, then tickets, then bugs? For incoming things we might be able to add them to the daily standup... but I don't think we can get through backlog there. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
