Re: Is pam_url still used anywhere or can I let it die?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:56:22PM +0000, Mattia Verga wrote:
> A couple of years ago I've taken maintainership of pam_url to avoid
> package retirement. In the relevant thread [1] it was said that "we only
> will still need this until we move off fas2" and in current ansible repo
> I can't find it used anywhere.
> 
> Now, I've received a request to package pam_url for epel9 [2], but since
> upstream seems dead I'd rather prefer to orphan the package and let it
> die. Does anyone know if pam_url is still needed anywhere in Fedora
> infrastructure?

It is not used anymore at all in fedora infrastructure. Feel free to orphan it...

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux