So the trackers are now closed on: https://pagure.io/infra-docs and the docs hosted on there now have a link and html redirect to the new docs.fp.o site: https://docs.pagure.org/infra-docs/ I dont have access to remove or add redirects for the readthedocs site here, so that is still up: https://fedora-infra-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ cheers, ryanlerch On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 7:29 PM Ryan Lerch <rlerch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 9:39 AM Ryan Lerch <rlerch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > So thanks from some awesome hard work from @mkonecny, @asaleh, > > @dkirwan, @mobrien, and @nirik all the existing SOPs have been > > imported into the new docs.fedoraproject.org repository [1] and can be > > viewed on docs.fedoraproject.org [2]. > > > > The next step for the docs are to fully review the content of each SOP > > to ensure that it is still correct. (many of the SOPs refer to FAS2 > > and other things, and clearly need to be rewritten) For this step, i > > have created tickets for each SOP [3] and have tagged all of them as > > untraiged -- if they do require a re-write, i am going to tag it as > > such, otherwise if the SOP looks valid -- will close the ticket with a > > comment. > > > > Finally, should we alos consider now removing / archiving the other 2 > > places this content is living (the sphinx output on readthedocs and > > pagure docs) so there is no more confusion on where our docs live? > > On this point i saw that the developer guide hadnt been ported over to > the new asciidoc repo for docs.fp.o, so i did that porting, and the PR > is here: > > https://pagure.io/infra-docs-fpo/pull-request/134 > > that appears to be the last of the content on that old repo. > > cheers, > ryanlerch > > > > > cheers, > > ryanlerch > > > > > > > > [1] - https://pagure.io/infra-docs-fpo > > [2] - https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/infra/sysadmin_guide/ > > [3] - https://pagure.io/infra-docs-fpo/issues > > > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 1:10 PM Ryan Lerch <rlerch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > One approach here would be to have several repos (i.e. documents). For > > > example, we could break up this document: > > > https://fedora-infra-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ into > > > > > > * Fedora Infra Developers Guide > > > * Fedora Infra Sysadmin's Guide (i.e. the SOPs) > > > > > > We would probably have to create a new section on this page: > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/docs/ > > > There is an "Engineering Teams" section that contains a couple links > > > to our docs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/engineering/) > > > but a whole separate category on the main page is probably a good idea > > > here IMHO. > > > > > > This new section would probably list documents like the newish Fedora > > > Accounts document > > > (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-accounts/) and any other > > > user-facing documents about our apps too. > > > > > > For the structure of the sources, something simple like repos labelled > > > "Documentation" in the fedora-infra github org might be the way to go, > > > like the source for the Fedora Accounts docs: > > > https://github.com/search?q=topic%3Adocumentation+org%3Afedora-infra&type=Repositories > > > > > > cheers, > > > ryanlerch > > > > > > On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 9:49 PM Ryan Lerch <rlerch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Count me in. I'm keen to help out with this initiative! > > > > > > > > cheers, > > > > ryanlerch > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 7:44 PM Mark O'Brien <markobri@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> I think it's a good idea to centralize them like this. > > > >>> > > > >>> Some things are kind of hazy if they are Infrastructure or Release > > > >>> engineering, but otherwise I think the two areas could go well together. > > > >>> > > > >>> Probibly the first thing we should do is work on moving and reworking > > > >>> the contribution/getting started stuff out of the wiki and into docs. :) > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> This would be a good starting point as it is possibly our most important doc. > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Then, perhaps it might make sense to do a pass and mark/note all the > > > >>> docs we want to just drop (no longer relevent, etc). > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> The bulk of the work would be in this task I imagine, between deciding > > > >> what we don't need and rewriting what is out of date. > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks for working on this! > > > >>> > > > >>> kevin > > > >> > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > > >> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > >> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > >> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > > >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > > >> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > >> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure