It appears that the conversion fo python3 on fedbages was done about a year ago -- but never released or deployed into production. There is some discussion on this ticket here: https://github.com/fedora-infra/datanommer/issues/151 and also an infra ticket here: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10192 cheers, ryanlerch On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 6:25 PM Ryan Lerch <rlerch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 4:24 PM SmootherFrOgZ <lxtnow@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 6:49 AM Ryan Lerch <rlerch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Just wondering if there is anyone around here that is actively (or > >> semi-actively) maintaining the Fedora Badges system(s). > >> > >> The reason for this query is that we are currently working on the > >> datanommer / datagrepper transition to Fedora Messaging, and Fedora > >> Badges is revealing itself to be a special side-case. > >> > >> The majority of applications use the datagrepper JSON API to interact > >> with the store of messages that datanommer stuffs into its database. > >> However, badges appears to have direct access to the datanommer DB > >> using the datanommer.models module (which we use in datagrepper too, > >> obviously) Note too that FMN also hase this direct access rather than > >> using datanommer > >> > >> This in of itself doesnt seem to be a huge issue to the migration, as > >> the grep method of datanommer.models has not changed its API (which is > >> all these apps use to get data with), so in theory, we just need to > >> update datanommer.models on these applications and everything should > >> be hunky-dory. > >> > >> However, neither of these applications are running currently on > >> staging, so there is nowhere fo us to test this out. > >> > >> Long story long, just wondering if anyone is aware of any activeish > >> maintainers of these items so we can discuss further. > >> > > Hey Ryan, > > > > We can for sure work something out and update the necessary bits. > > Would you mind opening up a ticket and mentioning me so I can look at this? > > Ok -- we have this ticket open on datanommer if that helps: > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/datanommer/issues/151 > > cheers, > ryanlerch _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
