On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 6:49 AM Ryan Lerch <rlerch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Just wondering if there is anyone around here that is actively (or
semi-actively) maintaining the Fedora Badges system(s).
The reason for this query is that we are currently working on the
datanommer / datagrepper transition to Fedora Messaging, and Fedora
Badges is revealing itself to be a special side-case.
The majority of applications use the datagrepper JSON API to interact
with the store of messages that datanommer stuffs into its database.
However, badges appears to have direct access to the datanommer DB
using the datanommer.models module (which we use in datagrepper too,
obviously) Note too that FMN also hase this direct access rather than
using datanommer
This in of itself doesnt seem to be a huge issue to the migration, as
the grep method of datanommer.models has not changed its API (which is
all these apps use to get data with), so in theory, we just need to
update datanommer.models on these applications and everything should
be hunky-dory.
However, neither of these applications are running currently on
staging, so there is nowhere fo us to test this out.
Long story long, just wondering if anyone is aware of any activeish
maintainers of these items so we can discuss further.
Hey Ryan,
We can for sure work something out and update the necessary bits.
Would you mind opening up a ticket and mentioning me so I can look at this?
Cheers,
Xavier.t Lamien
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
