On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 23:02, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:18:54PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 18. 11. 20 v 2:11 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > We are close to replacing this app with a new setup...
> >
> > see the 'packages app' thread in this very list. ;)
>
> Did we come to conclusion which app (out of these two) we are going to deploy?
Well, I personally thought it would be better to go with the community
maintained one. Less work for you/your team, more respectfull of the
work they already put into this, and I know you and your team are busy.
>
> If that will be the fedora-packages-ng I will be happy to proceed and spin up VM in AWS and update playbooks. I just
> need the green light :)
> If that helps, I can promise that CPT (aka Copr) team will maintain it.
Thats great, and if that was the only choice I would be very happy...
however, we have another community maintained/created one. :(
> On 11/24/20 5:18 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Dne 18. 11. 20 v 2:11 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > > We are close to replacing this app with a new setup...
> > >
> > > see the 'packages app' thread in this very list. ;)
> > Did we come to conclusion which app (out of these two) we are going to deploy?
>
> Timothée and I submitted a solution in April. It would be great if
> packages-static could be adopted.
>
> I have been consistently responding to all discussions on the mailing list.
> I did respond to the thread back in September. Kevin said you were busy and
> suggested -static and -ng be tested. I have submitted an RFR since then. I
> have time to maintain packages-static and I am still looking for a favorable
> decision.
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/SYM6OT4BGDOWF7EGOGG75YG5LOXB7XMF/#YD5TFWZHBITXZBA35KDELKDGXANCH5E6
>
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9441
Yeah, I have had no time to work on deploying this, but it should be
pretty short work for any of the folks who have deployed apps in our
openshift.
I'd personally go with static, but perhaps thats just me.
Yeah I think we should give a chance to the static solution, which seems to be the easier to maintain and run on the long term.
I would love to hear from more feedback one way or another.
Miroslav: what do you think? would you be ok if we went with static and
in the event something didn't work there or we needed more functionality
down the road we could move to ng then and in the mean time less work
for you?
Please chime in everyone. :)
kevin
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
