On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 02:13:23PM -0500, Brendan Early wrote: > On 9/22/20 4:21 AM, Flo H wrote: > > are there any plans to revamp and re-deploy the packages app that was hosted on https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages previously? > > There are two different replacements; no decision on which one will be > used has been made yet. It also seems that communishift won't be coming > back for a while, so it probably will take some time before anything > happens. > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/JLKMBMMGR6H6OSLW35ZXODPNAQP4OIEF > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/Q74QYG54MNBCY7UX2GITPAZYKHD6BYFH Well, we do have staging available and we can also perhaps spin up some instances in ec2 to test with. Can you share with us the state of fedora-packages-static? If we wanted to spin up a test / deploy in stg is it ready for that? Or needs more work? Msuchy: can you share the same info on fedora-packages-ng? I'd kind of be leaning toward fedora-packages-static myself because it makes sense to me that the data is pretty static and also Msuchy has a bunch of other things on his plate. :) kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
