On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 6:34 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:41 AM Tomas Tomecek <ttomecek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > We actually are. I assume you're asking about why we're not using > > > packit. We're not on GitHub so the service isn't (as far as I can tell) > > > useful to us. There's huge piles of existing bash scripts and makefiles > > > that achieve about what I think packit-the-cli would give us so it > > > would be some amount of work with no obvious benefit to move at the > > > moment. Generally speaking, though, I'm not against the idea. > > > > When we started packit, we played with the scripts and makefiles in > > your kernel repo and I hope it's not too bold of me to say that it > > shouldn't be that hard to integrate the two now. > > > > I'm assuming you're using pagure.io - at this point, we're not going > > to integrate packit with pagure (for obvious reasons). What are your > > future plans for the git forge? > > What the heck are you talking about? pagure.io is not going away > anytime soon. And there will be other pagure instances that host > source code that packit integration support would be useful for. > > Hell, I've already offered to help with the pagure.io service. Neal, I understand you are frustrated after I read some of your responses in other threads. I'd appreciate if you didn't use such strong language when reaching out to me. My point with the sentence was that we'd be busy adding GitLab integration into packit in coming months, tightening our capacity. I also didn't say anything about pagure.io going away. I was just interested in the details. Actually, pagure support is being added to packit these days (starting here [1]). So far no one was pushing us hard to add native pagure.io integration hence it's not present. To this day we've received a bunch of requests to support GitLab [2] (you're on the thread as well) and that's it. If you have a strong case for having packit working with pagure.io (doing RPM builds for PRs mainly), please open an issue [3] so we can track this request. Once [1] is merged, it shouldn't be that difficult to do such a thing (I expect that pagure.io and git.centos.org use the same fedmsg payloads though). [1] https://github.com/packit-service/packit-service/pull/515 [2] https://github.com/packit-service/packit-service/issues/249 [3] https://github.com/packit-service/packit-service/issues/new Cheers, Tomas _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
