On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:41 AM Tomas Tomecek <ttomecek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > We actually are. I assume you're asking about why we're not using > > packit. We're not on GitHub so the service isn't (as far as I can tell) > > useful to us. There's huge piles of existing bash scripts and makefiles > > that achieve about what I think packit-the-cli would give us so it > > would be some amount of work with no obvious benefit to move at the > > moment. Generally speaking, though, I'm not against the idea. > > When we started packit, we played with the scripts and makefiles in > your kernel repo and I hope it's not too bold of me to say that it > shouldn't be that hard to integrate the two now. > > I'm assuming you're using pagure.io - at this point, we're not going > to integrate packit with pagure (for obvious reasons). What are your > future plans for the git forge? > > The benefits would be that you'd get all the features of packit which > we have right now and those we implement in future. > While the scripts have changed a bit, I don't see any actual benefit to packit with what we are doing. The script to create a release builds the dist-git. This was more about managing the lookaside so that we weren't uploading quite as much with the daily kernel builds in rawhide. Justin _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
