On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > We actually are. I assume you're asking about why we're not using > packit. We're not on GitHub so the service isn't (as far as I can tell) > useful to us. There's huge piles of existing bash scripts and makefiles > that achieve about what I think packit-the-cli would give us so it > would be some amount of work with no obvious benefit to move at the > moment. Generally speaking, though, I'm not against the idea. When we started packit, we played with the scripts and makefiles in your kernel repo and I hope it's not too bold of me to say that it shouldn't be that hard to integrate the two now. I'm assuming you're using pagure.io - at this point, we're not going to integrate packit with pagure (for obvious reasons). What are your future plans for the git forge? The benefits would be that you'd get all the features of packit which we have right now and those we implement in future. Tomas _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
