On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 12:27:48PM +0000, T.C. Williams wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 6:30 AM Clement Verna <cverna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 18:42, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 02:33:02PM -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > >> > On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 19:04 +0200, Clement Verna wrote: > >> > > I think the main reason why we don't already have it on Pagure is > >> > > that we don't want to be dependent of our own infrastructure to host > >> > > this repo. It currently lives on the batcave01 host which is the box > >> > > we use to deploy our infrastructure. So to me if we are going to host > >> > > this repository on a git forge I think using an external service > >> > > would make sense. > >> > >> I don't agree, unless we move/have all/more of our presense there. > >> > > > >> ie, I don't want to move just the fedora infrastructure ansible repo to > >> say gitlab and have it there by itself. I think thats really poor for > >> discoverability, etc. > >> > > > > Yes I agree with you. > > > > Please forgive the "new guy" ignorance, but I'm trying to understand why > Fedora Infrastructure wouldn't want to host its project on Fedora Pagure. > Shouldn't we eat our own dog food? Sure, but there's discussion if it's a better use of our time to stop maintaining pagure and just switch to one of the 'big' forges. They have tons more people, time, energy. All that said, nothing is decided as far as I know. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
