On Tue, 2019-09-17 at 19:01 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > Out of curiosity, do we know where the bottlenecks are in > repoSpanner? > In theory, the architecture of repoSpanner isn't supposed to be too > different from gitaly, so I'm curious where we're falling down. I believe it needs a more efficient way to store the git objects. As I understand it, it currently stores each one in its own file, resulting in a large number of small files.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
