On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 at 19:02, Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:47 PM Randy Barlow > <bowlofeggs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I don't expect it would be useful to perform this test with GitHub > > since I'd expect essentially the same results (bottlenecked on my home > > internet connection). > > Out of curiosity, do we know where the bottlenecks are in repoSpanner? > In theory, the architecture of repoSpanner isn't supposed to be too > different from gitaly, so I'm curious where we're falling down. > > Looking at the architecture of gitaly, there seems to be a redis? cache in front of the gitaly and file cache behind it. If I read that correctly than those are things which would make things seem much faster as they would hold things in faster memory access that the gitaly would be interfacing with. However, that is just a rough look at what is written up versus a domain knowledge. -- Stephen J Smoogen. _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
