Re: State/future of the packages app

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adding that button is quite trivial, a new button after https://pagure.io/pagure/blob/master/f/pagure/themes/srcfpo/templates/repo_info.html#_338 and is done.

On September 13, 2019 5:50:43 PM GMT+02:00, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 13:40 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 09:23:44 +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
>> > Yeah the packages app is really useful and used by many, this is
>the main
>> > reason it was not included in the application we are currently
>working on
>> > giving away / retiring. But to be honest I think the priority of
>the packages
>> > app is quite low. Following are some of the work we have in our
>Backlog :
>> >   • Packager UX improvement.
>> >   • FAS replacement.
>> >   • PDC replacement.
>> >   • OSBS support for aarch64.
>> >   • End to End testing and monitoring for the flatpak build
>pipeline.
>> >   • Package review process improvement.
>> >   • Fedora Infra technical debt.
>> 
>> Is there somewhere community members can read more on these tasks of
>the
>> CPE please?
>> 
>> For the packages app---if it's in maintenance mode, I guess that's OK
>> for the time being until something breaks.
>> 
>> There are two aspects of the packages app that aren't available on
>> src.fp.o that make it important for me:
>> 
>> - bugz.fp.o/packagename -> but I expect this can be aliased to a
>direct
>>   bugzilla query type URL? "Open bugs" on the packages app heads to
>>   bugzilla already:
>>  
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product=Fedora&product=Fedora+EPEL&component=python-rosinstall_generator&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED
>
>The feature this doesn't get you is the handy 'open a new bug for this
>package' button. Which again can be replicated as a direct Bugzilla
>link, but...you need at least a thing to serve a page showing those two
>links :)
>
>>   There are DDG bangs for bugzilla by the way but they don't search
>by
>>   component (I'll suggest a new one soon): !rbugs, !rhbz
>> 
>> - "Install this package" -> this is critical. I was wondering if
>there
>>   was a way to allow users to "click to install",
>
>There is actually supposed to be a URI format that PackageKit-based
>package managers should handle, IIRC, but that was a 2014-vintage thing
>or something so no idea if it still works.

Julen Landa Alustiza <jlanda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux