Yeah the packages app is really useful and used by many, this is the main reason it was not included in the application we are currently working on giving away / retiring. But to be honest I think the priority of the packages app is quite low. Following are some of the work we have in our Backlog :
- Packager UX improvement.
- FAS replacement.
- PDC replacement.
- OSBS support for aarch64.
- End to End testing and monitoring for the flatpak build pipeline.
- Package review process improvement.
- Fedora Infra technical debt.
On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 at 00:26, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 9/12/19 3:00 PM, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:17 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I also used 'pkgwat releases packagename' a lot. (pkgwat was the
>> packages command line app, but it's python2 only, so it went away I
>> fear.
>
>
> Except it did not :) , it's also using Python 3.
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pkgwat/blob/master/f/pkgwat.spec
Cool. I must be thinking of one of the other 11biillion packages that
was python2 only. :)
kevin
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
