Hello, I was looking for information on the future of the packages application[1]. I didn't see it mentioned in the commblog post[2]. Is it OK for us to link to the packages application in documentation, or should we just link to src.fp.o already (in the NeuroFedora documentation[3]) for example? The one thing that makes us prefer the packages app is that it has the install command listed there while src.fp.o does not. That makes the packages app somewhat more appropriate for end-users than src.fp.o---src.fp.o has links to all the other build pipelines otherwise. [1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages [2] https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/application-service-categories-and-community-handoff/ [3] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/neurofedora/compneuro-tools/ -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
