On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 17:12:06 +0200, Martin Kolman wrote: > On Tue, 2019-06-04 at 16:41 +0200, Julen Landa Alustiza wrote: > > If we are going with the approach of just one paste platform, we > > could just retire fpaste, add cpaste with an fpaste alias and > > provides on rpm spec, retire paste.fp.o and redirect it to > > paste.centos =) > Just a note - if we go this way, the templates used for intallation > image creation will have to be adjusted to pull in cpaste instead of > fpaste (unless cpaste starts to provide fpaste, which should hopefully > pull it in). cpaste will have to be packaged up before that can be done too. I think it's fine to have two different tools here. CentOS and Fedora still move at different speeds, so each tool can be tweaked as per the distro's requirements. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
