On 5/20/19 12:56 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: > I don't see that running our own pastebin is valuable to the > community. There are plenty of other options for people to post things > (pastebin.com, GitHub gists, put a file in your web space on Fedora > people, etc). I'm in favor of option 3, with a long enough timeline > for the fpaste maintainers to handle the change and for the docs team > to make sure we update any docs that refer to pase.fp.o accordingly > (if any) > +1 to Option 3. My biggest use for paste.fp.o is via fpaste in CLI. To me, it also makes more sense to use an existing service and point the fpaste tool there. So long as fpaste continues to work, my use case and likely others' does not break. -- Cheers, Justin W. Flory justinwflory.com TZ=America/New_York Pronouns: he/him/his
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
