Re: Backwards incompatible updates to Fedora 29

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 14:49 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I also find it significant that libdnf still has, so far as I can
> tell,
> absolutely no interface documentation -
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/libdnf links to "the
> hawkey
> documentation page", which is obviously wildly outdated at this point
> -
> and that this API-breaking change was not even mentioned in the
> libdnf
> release notes:
> https://github.com/rpm-software-management/libdnf/blob/master/docs/release_notes.rst

I filed issues about this:

https://github.com/rpm-software-management/libdnf/issues/719
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/libdnf/issues/720

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux