Re: [Freeze Break Request] Add zchunk support to updates and updates-testing repositories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2019-03-30 at 14:05 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> +1
> 
> On Sat, 30 Mar 2019 at 13:53, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 3/29/19 1:33 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2019-03-11 at 20:23 +0000, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2019-03-11 at 11:24 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > > On 3/11/19 12:26 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > > > > > This adds zchunk support for the updates and updates-testing
> > > > > > repositories for both rpms and modularity.  We already have zchunk
> > > > > > metadata being generated for the fedora repository.  I'd like to
> > > > > > get this in before Beta comes out so Beta users will have zchunk-
> > > > > > enabled updates-testing repositories when Beta is released.
> > > > > 
> > > > > yeah, hopefilly not too much pain since it's been in rawhide a while now.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > I am making the assumption that a zchunk-enabled createrepo_c (0.12.0-2
> > > > > > or later) is available on the builders (I think I'm safe making that
> > > > > > assumption, since zchunk metadata is already being generated for some
> > > > > > repos).
> > > > > 
> > > > > Well, bodhi-backend01 (where the updates process/pungi runs for these)
> > > > > has a newer one, so yes. It's all run on bodhi-backend01, not builders.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > I have *not* tested this patch, because I'm not sure how I'd go about
> > > > > > doing so.  If we don't have any test builders, my suggestion would be
> > > > > > to wait until no compose is running, and then run this play on a
> > > > > > builder, verifying that the generated pungi configuration is valid for
> > > > > > both f29 and f30, with no createrepo_extra_args in f29.
> > > > > 
> > > > > yeah, we can commit this, run the playbook then examine the results.
> > > > 
> > > > Great.  I'm on UTC time right now, so hopefully I'll be off of work and
> > > > available if there are any issues whenever we get another +1 and you
> > > > run it.  I do expect that it will go fine.
> > > 
> > > Since we never got the extra +1 to get this in before Beta, are we at a
> > > point where we can turn this on now?
> > 
> > Nope, we are still frozen until the day after beta release. ;(
> > 
> > But I will try and scare up another +1
> > 
> > kevin
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Stephen J Smoogen.

Stephen and Kevin, thanks so much!

Jonathan
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux