On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 4:28 PM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 1/21/19 10:13 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > So, we've got a bit of a problem. The sigul package is not installable > > in Fedora 29, and pygpgme is half-broken in Fedora 28 and was retired > > during Fedora 29 development due to constant breakage. > > > > This means that sigul is in danger of being retired in Fedora. > > Unfortunately, sigul is the only supported signer system for Koji at > > the moment. > > > > What do we want to do here? It's well-known that sigul does not work > > with GnuPG 2, though I vaguely recall that some work was done to try > > to fix this. > > > > Do we want to port sigul to python3-gpg, switching Sigul to Python 3 > > and the official gpgme bindings so that it works with GnuPG 2? > > I would think this would be the way to go, but of course it's up to Patrick. > Is this in progress anywhere? > > > > Or do we want to adapt the bridge to work with obs-signd (which is > > already used by Copr)? > > This is a non starter, obs-signd doesn't do everything that sigul does > and we have a number of things that depend on sigul working the way it > does. > Forgive me, but what does sigul do that signd cannot? I'm unaware of any material differences between the two. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
