On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 9:25 PM Dusty Mabe <dusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/29/2018 11:16 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 7:07 PM Dusty Mabe <dusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/25/2018 01:25 PM, Sinny Kumari wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is a patch (available in email attachment) to include updates-testing repo
> > as well during Atomic Host ISO creation in bodhi updates-testing run. Specifying
> > multiple repos to lorax should work fine on Fedora >=29 -
> > https://github.com/weldr/lorax/issues/368 .
> >
> > Can I get +1 for the patch?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sinny
>
>
> Suggested change below. I think we just need to uncomment out the commented out code right
> above the lines you changed.
>
>
> Thanks Dusty for reviewing it!
>
> - updates run will run lorax against
> - Everything
> - the current updates run
>
> +1
>
> - https://kojipkgs{{ env_suffix }}.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/latest-Fedora-[[ <http://fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/latest-Fedora-%5B%5B> release.version_int ]]/compose/Everything/[[arch]]/os/
> - the release day repo
>
>
> With RC 1.2 being Gold, does it make sense to make this https://kojipkgs{{ env_suffix }}.fedoraproject.org/compose/[[ <http://fedoraproject.org/compose/[[> release.version_int ]]/latest-Fedora-[[ release.version_int ]]/compose/Everything/[[arch]]/os/ ?
I think probably we should just change the "if conditions" to `== 30` in places where it makes sense now that f29 is going to be released, which should achieve the same goal right?
Yeah, I will be doing same code wise
Dusty
--
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
