On 10/29/2018 11:16 AM, Sinny Kumari wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 7:07 PM Dusty Mabe <dusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > > On 10/25/2018 01:25 PM, Sinny Kumari wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here is a patch (available in email attachment) to include updates-testing repo > > as well during Atomic Host ISO creation in bodhi updates-testing run. Specifying > > multiple repos to lorax should work fine on Fedora >=29 - > > https://github.com/weldr/lorax/issues/368 . > > > > Can I get +1 for the patch? > > > > Thanks, > > Sinny > > > Suggested change below. I think we just need to uncomment out the commented out code right > above the lines you changed. > > > Thanks Dusty for reviewing it! > > - updates run will run lorax against > - Everything > - the current updates run > > +1 > > - https://kojipkgs{{ env_suffix }}.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/latest-Fedora-[[ <http://fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/latest-Fedora-%5B%5B> release.version_int ]]/compose/Everything/[[arch]]/os/ > - the release day repo > > > With RC 1.2 being Gold, does it make sense to make this https://kojipkgs{{ env_suffix }}.fedoraproject.org/compose/[[ <http://fedoraproject.org/compose/[[> release.version_int ]]/latest-Fedora-[[ release.version_int ]]/compose/Everything/[[arch]]/os/ ? I think probably we should just change the "if conditions" to `== 30` in places where it makes sense now that f29 is going to be released, which should achieve the same goal right? Dusty _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
