On 09/11/2018 09:26 AM, Aurelien Bompard wrote: >> I've been playing around with openshift staging for the last few weeks >> and enabling some cool features. :) > > Cool! I seem to remember that having persistent storage in our > Openshift instance was a difficult thing. I'm considering Openshift to > setup a PyPI caching proxy for us, and that will require some disk > space. Is this still an issue? Well, sorta yeah. We do have it to where we can use nfs volumes for the registery (because they required storage for that), but it's not really a good solution for everything as it's very manual. Could this caching proxy just use EmpyDir (ie, only for the life of that pod) and just refresh when it restarts? If it really needs disk, might be better to do on a vm at this point. Hopefully we can get to where our persistent storage story is better down the road... kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
