This was applied and can be considered closed. On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 at 10:48, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 at 10:43, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 at 10:40, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > So, I was hoping we could get away with 1 instance per stg/prod... > > > > > > if we are doing 3 for each one that really cuts hard into our existing > > > builders. > > > > I may have misunderstood cverna earlier, but it looked like we needed > > at least 2 per staging and prod because we need a master and a node. I > > put in the second node into DNS so it was ready if it came up later as > > needed. > > > > Hit send too soon. My plan is to put osbs-aarch64-master01.stg and > osbs-aarch64-node01.stg on aarch64-23. I will put > osbs-aarch64-master/node on aarch64-24 later. If there is further need > then we would put the other nodes on other hardware later. > > -- > Stephen J Smoogen. -- Stephen J Smoogen. _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
