Greetings! At the hackathon we did recently, we talked about the need for one of us to attend the Modularity WG meetings so we could be more aware of what work is coming our way before it's a surprise, and I volunteered to be that person. For $reasons, today was the first of the WG meetings I was able to attend. There were two items of interest: New service =========== I learned that Factory 2 is developing a new service called Ursa Major. I gathered that its mission is to make it so that RPMs that depend on modules can get those modules pulled into their buildroot. Ralph, is the above correct? If so, what time frame do you anticipate us needing to get this service deployed to infrastructure? Meetings ======== The modularity WG suggested that it was probably not that beneficial for me to attend their meetings as an infra liason, as they are not actually particularly familiar with the infrastructure side of things. They suggested instead that we interface with Factory 2. A suggestion was made that perhaps we could have an agenda item on *our* meeting, perhaps once a month, where we invite modularity WG and factory 2 to talk with us about what is coming our way, or about issues that need dealing with. I thought this was a fine suggestion, so I wanted to ask you all what you thought about it? _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx