On 04/20/2018 10:34 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > We have been informed thst week at the upstream devs working on the > product-definition-center (PDC) are moving away from the project and are going > to leave it without a maintainer. Since we adopted PDC for a variety of data > flows, this puts us in an awkward position. :( ...snip.. > > I propose we start the discussion on the list and plan for a meeting sometime > late next week to discuss it further with the interested parties (please signal > yourself) > > > What do you think? So, some generic thoughts: * I kinda don't like the tree of files in git. It would work, but it seems poor, like we don't know how to use a database. Along with just strange to work with. * Right now we have (I think) 3 Django apps... mailman3, pdc and ask. Of course the people doing the work should choose, but it seems like with Django there's always a treadmill of keeping it on the new version thats supported, etc. We ran into this with pdc recently where the version upstream was using wouldn't work with rhel or fedora django without work. * If we are going to split out just the things we need, perhaps this would be a good time to try our hand at microservices? ie, small as we can make them, run in openshift, deploy quickly/all the time, etc If we do that we should make sure to gather requirements and only make those things we need to. Definitely include me in on the planning... thanks. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
