On 09/25/2017 07:12 AM, Jeremy Cline wrote: > On 09/20/2017 01:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Could we build the new pyOpenSSL/cryptography for epel7, but as python3 >> only? (so it doesn't override the base rhel one)? > > We could do that. The only downsides I can really think of is it's > surprising to have different versions of the same library on Python 2 vs > Python 3, but since this is in our own repository I don't think that's a > big deal. Yeah, I think some people are already doing it, but I could see how it might be confusing... Also, the number of people using python3 on epel is I suspect very low. > >> I guess I'd be ok doing this (we are kind of in a bad place, so none of >> the choices are great), but we should get at least 3-4 of us to watch >> commits on the fedora pyOpenSSL and cryptography to make sure we see >> issues/bugs/updates as they happen? > > Definitely, although fortunately pyOpenSSL is in maintenance mode and > should be reasonably quiet. I'm a maintainer on the Fedora pyOpenSSL > and cryptography, so as long as a couple more people keep an eye on > them we should be set. Cool. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
