On 09/20/2017 01:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Could we build the new pyOpenSSL/cryptography for epel7, but as python3 > only? (so it doesn't override the base rhel one)? We could do that. The only downsides I can really think of is it's surprising to have different versions of the same library on Python 2 vs Python 3, but since this is in our own repository I don't think that's a big deal. > I guess I'd be ok doing this (we are kind of in a bad place, so none of > the choices are great), but we should get at least 3-4 of us to watch > commits on the fedora pyOpenSSL and cryptography to make sure we see > issues/bugs/updates as they happen? Definitely, although fortunately pyOpenSSL is in maintenance mode and should be reasonably quiet. I'm a maintainer on the Fedora pyOpenSSL and cryptography, so as long as a couple more people keep an eye on them we should be set. -- Jeremy Cline XMPP: jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx IRC: jcline
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
