> On 08/01/2017 04:50 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 10:23:13PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>>> In stg I put it under src.stg.fp.o/pagure so it stands nicely on the side of
>>> everything else on the server and to be sure it is not going to conflict.
>>> But, do we want to follow the same path in production or do we want to deploy it
>>> at src.fp.o/ directly?
>>
>> Are there other things we might want want to put at the top level, or
>> at other levels with the same top URL? Documentation? Actual exploded
>> source trees? If not, top level seems fine. If so, do we want to use
>> the name of the software ("pagure") or something descriptive (like
>> "dist-git", even if that's mainly descriptive to packagers?).
>>
>> (Unrelated: the banner in stg has "fedora PAGURE" at the top. Is there
>> a design ticket for a dist-git banner?)
>>
>>
>
> Any reason we can't make it a "group" within the other pagure at pagure.io?
dist-git is currently different infrastructure, I'm not even sure if
pague.io is hosted in the same DC/network.
I like the root src.fp.o/ idea, adding the extra pagure/ just seems
like extra characters for no extra benefit.
Peter
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
