On 07/31/2017 11:04 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 07/31/2017 01:16 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: >> Hello, >> >> COPR now operates with packages solely from official Fedora repositories. >> This was requested in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/5166 as >> a condition to get the Fedora Infra support. I would like to ask for the >> support now as this condition is finally satisfied \o/. > > Well, there's still one big issue left (which is hopefully going away > soon): The cloud itself isnt very supportable. > We are getting new hardware in soon (it's ordered and should be > installed in Aug) and are going to setup a new cloud on the latest > version with multiple controller nodes in a High available setup. Once > thats done and we move copr to it, we should be in a much better place. ;) > >> Perhaps this could be reflected in: >> - the Service Level Expectations that are being prepared >> - removing the user message on COPR homepage >> - change of the domain back to fedoraproject.org (?) > > We could do this, but we need to make sure everything is https and has a > valid cert. (But I think thats the case now anyhow?) > Is it ok to use letsencrypt certs? There is an awesome project started by Hatter in Brno that handles getting a new letsencrypt cert for you for every route you annotate (in openshift) to tell it to do so. It'll get the cert and update the route for you. I used it this weekend and t's freakin awesome. https://github.com/tnozicka/openshift-acme Dusty _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
