On 07/31/2017 01:16 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: > Hello, > > COPR now operates with packages solely from official Fedora repositories. > This was requested in https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/5166 as > a condition to get the Fedora Infra support. I would like to ask for the > support now as this condition is finally satisfied \o/. Well, there's still one big issue left (which is hopefully going away soon): The cloud itself isnt very supportable. We are getting new hardware in soon (it's ordered and should be installed in Aug) and are going to setup a new cloud on the latest version with multiple controller nodes in a High available setup. Once thats done and we move copr to it, we should be in a much better place. ;) > Perhaps this could be reflected in: > - the Service Level Expectations that are being prepared > - removing the user message on COPR homepage > - change of the domain back to fedoraproject.org (?) We could do this, but we need to make sure everything is https and has a valid cert. (But I think thats the case now anyhow?) > - moving COPR to a platform where the support is actually possible yeah, see above. ;) We also talked about moving the frontend behind our normal proxies and internal infra. I would think that should work fine, but the backend and builders would still make more sense in cloud. > I particularly like the idea of running COPR solely in OpenShift or in RHOSP > 10+ with having builders as OpenShift pods but this is not really my > decision. I think thats pretty interesting for a longer term road map, but shorter term we can just get the current setup on a better foundation. > > I am happy this is finally going somewhere. Yeah! kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
