On 07/11/2017 11:18 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > One of the things I've been working on (along with several other > people, including mattdm, dgilmore and pingou) is sussing out Fedora > requirements on a CI/CD pipeline. I published the results to this > page: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_requirements_for_CI_and_CD > > Since Fedora infra is a stakeholder (along with release engineering, > QA, etc.), my thought is this page helps us clarify requirements and > avoid surprises down the road. Also this might be useful to show to > e.g. FESCo as a joint policy. > > Rather than just editing the page willy nilly, based on the number of > people it's already been through, it would be great if folks could use > the "discussion" (Talk) page to suggest changes. But I have a watch > on the page and can help resolve issues. > I've fallen behind on email the past couple of weeks, but I saw this when I was quickly scrolling through the Infrastructure list… this is really interesting and I'd like to keep up with more updates on progress on developing the CI/CD pipeline for Fedora. Is there any singular place where someone can follow along with updates about this outside of the Infrastructure list? Or has anyone considered writing a Community Blog article about some of these plans / ideas? Even though I don't have a lot of feedback to contribute, I'm sure a Community Blog article might solicit a little wider feedback and also inform people about some of these plans, even if it's still very early in the process. :) -- Cheers, Justin W. Flory jflory7@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
