On 05/19/2017 03:22 AM, Faber wrote: > i think there is an issue with my patch; i'm following the original idea > to have stage ip similar to prod ip > > for example: noc01.stg.phx2.fedoraproject.org -> 10.5.126.2 > noc01-a.stg.phx2.fedoraproject.org -> 10.5.128.41 [ matches noc01 on > 10.5.126.41] Note that we want them to have the same exact names as they do now. This is because we have our staging env set in /etc/resolv.conf to search for hosts in stg.phx2.fedoraproject.org first... so in staging a 'noc01' would get the ip for 'noc01.stg.phx2.fedoraproject.org' but in production would get 'noc01.phx2.fedoraproject.org' We do this so we can keep a lot of the config the same and it just works. > > btw with dhcp IPs going from 10.5.128.10 to 10.5.128.20 there will be > duplicates > > @smooge is it ok to use your stg.phx2.fedoraproject.org file but with > the 128 ip space instead of 126? > > so we have ips moved from 10.5.126 -> 10.5.128 numbers, but not 1:1 While it might be handy to make them 1:1 on IP's, I don't think it's a requirement... so sure. > it seems all IPs there are unique, except for fas-all and fas01 both > with 10.5.126.86 Yep. That fas-all in stg is just a pointer to the one fas server (since we only have one there). In production it points to all 3 of the servers we have in place. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
