Hi Faber. Thanks for keeping this up. It should be ok to use the file even if we do not implement this until after the freeze is over. On 19 May 2017 at 05:22, Faber <erfabbri@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > i think there is an issue with my patch; i'm following the original idea to > have stage ip similar to prod ip > > for example: noc01.stg.phx2.fedoraproject.org -> 10.5.126.2 > noc01-a.stg.phx2.fedoraproject.org -> 10.5.128.41 [ matches noc01 on > 10.5.126.41] > > btw with dhcp IPs going from 10.5.128.10 to 10.5.128.20 there will be > duplicates > > @smooge is it ok to use your stg.phx2.fedoraproject.org file but with the > 128 ip space instead of 126? > > so we have ips moved from 10.5.126 -> 10.5.128 numbers, but not 1:1 > > it seems all IPs there are unique, except for fas-all and fas01 both with > 10.5.126.86 > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > -- Stephen J Smoogen. _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
